Training-Variety and hitting a little bit of everything

9 replies [Last post]
CSCS and WNBF PRO
Cytrainer913's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-11-26
Points: 0
Training-Variety and hitting a little bit of everything

 

Low-Load High Volume Resistance Exercise Stimulates Muscle Protein Synthesis More Than High-Load Low Volume Resistance Exercise in Young Men

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0012033

 

There are some guys using this as their main method to gaining size and strength and I just think some people will respond to this method while others will respond to lower rep counts, you have to see what will work for you. I believe there is a way to try and integrate a variety of methods into your training in some sort of schematic way to where you do a little bit of everything no matter what your goals are, there are benefits to be made from lower reps, hypertrophy style training, and yes even the higher reps style training. Each will add their own little aspect to what will give you your most complete package. I don't think any one style is good to stay on for any lengthy period of time. I have integrated a variety of training styles that you can see in the workouts and training section on here and it allows your to make progressions yet at the same time the joints and muscles get the recovery they so badly need when you are training on the natural end of the spectrum.

In my 1st week, I call it the Power week(HEAVY), where I will do heavy compound moves and my focus is on working those multi joint moves like the bench press, squats, and deads with reps in the range of 4 sets of 5, then even a set of 2 reps at the end and when I am at the end of the workouts, I do some sort of back off set where i really hit a set of 20-25 reps, or even do a Dogg Crapp style training Rest pause set to really help to release those good hormones to help with muscles being rebuilt.

In my 2nd week, I call it the TUT(Time under Tension week-Rep tempos-my (LIGHT) week, where I perform very long sets of that will end up being closer to a minute or more where i will go slow on the negatives, slow on the positives, do supersets, 100 reps sets, Drop sets, and all of these styles will really cause you to connect the mind with the muscle and the form becomes the big emphasis and this week really hits the muscles without stressing the joints and can also help to hit endurance aspect of the type IIa fibers, and can help with capillary branching, increase the buffering action of the muscles and TUT tensions has also been shown to help build those muscles as well.

In the 3rd week, I call it HYPERVOL week(MEDIUM), which is short for hypertrophy and Volume all rolled into this one week and every muscle gets their own workout. Now this hits the classical rep range that has been proven to build muscles the most in that 8-12 range, and i do one main exercise for each day and then the volume takes over and then I really hit those muscle with some crazy pumps using trisets and giant sets with reps ranges being in the 15-20 range, and then I finish off with another crazy pump on each day with the FST-7's, which will really get your heart rate going and also some great muscle stretches along with hitting those type IIa fibers. 

So when you combine all of these aspects into your training and see that each time you come around to the Heavy week you should be able to make a good 3-4 progressions before maybe using a de-loading week, but really there should always be some good things happening when you incorporate both ends of the spectrum while at the same time making progress. Periodization is the best word anyone can use in their training whether you are the average Joe Schmoe walking down the street or the extreme situation of prepping for a show as a bodybuilder or a figure competitor. And I love the noncyclic or undulating periodization over the linear periodization any day of the week.

 

I thought this would be a good topic to discuss here, what do you all think about this? Joe, Sean? The rest of the Team K?

CSCS and WNBF PRO
Cytrainer913's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-11-26
Points: 0

I will guess I will add more to this about the training and see anyone wants to get in on this subject of training:

 

http://www.leangains.com/2010/08/high-reps-vs-low-reps-for-muscle-gain.html

 

Pretty good conversation with these guys, too!

CSCS and WNBF PRO
Cytrainer913's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-11-26
Points: 0

This stuff kind of goes into what Sean what saying in NB&F in the Nov issue as well.

Ran a 5k (www.cjsbus.org) with Cameron and Lynnea dominated the kids' dash - good way to start a Saturday!
Dr. Joe's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-10-14
Points: 0

Great topic - I need to hear that heavy-always isn't the best.  You know, Craig, I'm the king of micro- and meso-periodization....but to stay fresh and getting stronger.....it's a battle to think of the higher-rep stuff as equally fun; but not only is it necessary and effective; it's a vital part of progress.  A key, though, is to train to failure in those rep ranges....good intensity.

 

I got a chance to train with Mat Park in Canada for three days in a row and the word "intensity" defines that atmosphere.  Very disciplined and very intense - and all of our work was in moderate rep ranges; not heavy.  Not to poo-poo heavy work; I won't give that up until I break a hip or have a plate in my spine, but it makes you rethink heavy/insane/dangerous versus heavy, yet controlled.  It's too easy to forget soft tissue will tear....and does.
 

Laid back European . . . it has been said . .
Alan's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-11-15
Points: 0

I'll second Joe on this one!

Workout out, as I do these days, at the shiny end of the dumbbell rack, this is music to my ears. Apart from the obvious, that people are far better looking that train at this end of the rack, I need to know that what I am doing has purpose . . . . . . . ;)

CSCS and WNBF PRO
Cytrainer913's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-11-26
Points: 0

Like you said Joe, I love doing heavier stuff and I had to really fight with myself to let these lighter workouts come into play but the more I have seen about what the workouts can do for you I am trying no matter how rough it is for me and I really struggle with reps once they get up there!

It's like running that mile or even more than one lap around a track, but i am committed to getting it done and just did one of the toughest workouts for me to handle today with basically 60 reps in a row w/o a break on 4 exercises and that's crazy for me!

Already excited for Fantasy Camp in January!
Sean's picture
Offline
Joined: 2009-02-02
Points: 0

Fun topic for sure here.

First of all, don't let Kraemer read that study. It could start a war. ;) I opened the link and the first thing I was looking for was the test subjects history of training and though I skimmed through it, I did not see any history indicated. So if they were previously de-trained, anything would show response. However, the study's finding are really interesting given that they compared directly to more traditional strength protocols.

Secondly, anybody who talks to me or trains with me knows that I am also a huge proponent of changing things up frequently and that includes keeping some higher rep work in there. We need to hit all the fiber we can and we need to push your body in more than one way if we are looking to maximize your performance in the gym. The volume itself can be manipulated based on the person...but to integrate higher reps in a program along with the lower rep work that we do more traditionally is always going to yield the best result. The key is to make sure the program itself is well structured. We love training heavy...but we have to allow for enough recovery so that we don't get hurt.

 

Too bad you didn't post this up about 5 years ago...you know, before Joe tore about 83 different muscles and a couple of tendons. ;)

CSCS and WNBF PRO
Cytrainer913's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-11-26
Points: 0

Did you see the leg volume and reps on this workout, SEAN?

 

 

Today was the Quads workout and man are my legs burnt out and I did the workout the way i wanted to even though not still at 100% in my lungs, as far as congestion goes.

hypertrophy exercise was front squats for 4 sets of 6-10 reps
2 warm ups of 12,10 reps
then working sets
175x10,195x9,205x7,225x5, just couldn't get that last rep as the weight wated to slide a bit on the shoulders

Now here came the giant set i wanted to do although i was considering doing it in 2 supsersets but i think wouldn't be as effective. And man was I right, I did again track my cals on my HR monitor and the workout was another 965 cals. these giant sets took about 5 min and the HR stayed above 140 after the 1st exercise and mainly in the 160's for the duration of the giant set. 5 straight min of a HR for 160's, screw cardio thats for me! here's what it consisted of 3 cycles of 15 reps each exercise for 4 exercises.

Leg extensions
then to
Leg press 6 plates aside
then to
Smith machine squats legs a little forward
then to 
regular squats!

Yeah I'm done, NOT!

I needed my FST-7's for 7 sets of 10 with 30 sec breathers in between doing the leg press using 6 plates aside! 

NOW I'M DONE!!!!

CSCS and WNBF PRO
Cytrainer913's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-11-26
Points: 0

What's that QUOTE?

 

"GO HEAVY OR GO HOME!" 

Ran a 5k (www.cjsbus.org) with Cameron and Lynnea dominated the kids' dash - good way to start a Saturday!
Dr. Joe's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-10-14
Points: 0

I'm not sure there's a controversy here.  Hypertrophy training is good for.....hypertrophy.  You have to get stronger and it helps to go relatively heavy, but even fast-twitch fiber (which has the most growth potential) can be affected with good speed, short rest between sets, and good control.   Variety, baby.  Can you say NLP?  : )